Which production line would be the most cost-effective to start a preventive maintenance program?

Starting a preventive maintenance program requires careful consideration of production schedules to minimize downtime and ensure efficiency. In this context, the production line operating six days a week at 24 hours a day presents the most cost-effective option for several reasons.

This schedule allows for continuous operation, maximizing output while minimizing interruptions that could arise from maintenance activities. With 24-hour coverage, there is the flexibility to conduct preventive maintenance during off-peak hours or during planned downtimes, which can be more effectively coordinated.

Additionally, having six operational days allows for a comprehensive assessment of equipment wear and tear while still providing ample time for scheduled maintenance. Scheduling maintenance over a longer operational span prevents bottlenecks that might occur with shorter workweeks, where fewer days of operation could lead to larger maintenance backlogs.

While other options may provide reasonable frameworks, they might not balance the continuous operational needs with the preventive maintenance effectively. Operating seven days a week at 24 hours, for example, might lead to an exhaustion of resources and potential employee burnout, which could, in turn, increase costs. Five days a week at 10 hours could result in increased wear on equipment with less frequent maintenance opportunities. In contrast, the six-day schedule at 24 hours achieves a practical blend of operational efficiency